Ouvrir le menu

NEOMA's world

Thematics :

Donald Trump’s rhetoric, particularly his mentions of annexing Canada, reclaiming the Panama Canal, or controlling Greenland, raises a fundamental question: is this a manifestation of American expansionism or a form of geopolitics designed to distract? Edgar Bellow, Ph.D., professor of geopolitics and international management at NEOMA Business School shares his insights.

A Dual Dynamic

edgar-bellow_prof_geopolitique_NEOMA

Trump’s rhetoric straddles the line between symbolic expansionism and geopolitics of distraction. While some aspects may reflect strategic ambitions, it is likely that these declarations primarily serve to bolster his image, divert public attention, and fuel populist rhetoric. However, their impact on U.S. diplomacy and the global order should not be underestimated.

 

 

American Expansionism: A Strategic Vision?

Echoes of History

Expansionism has been a hallmark of U.S. history, from the Monroe Doctrine to “Manifest Destiny.” These statements may reflect an attempt to revive that legacy. Greenland, for example, holds strategic importance (natural resources, geographic location), and controlling it would strengthen U.S. influence in the Arctic.

Reasserting Global Dominance

Through such ideas, Trump may aim to project the U.S. as a dominant power capable of redrawing borders or reclaiming key territories.

Responding to Contemporary Challenges

In the context of growing rivalries with China and Russia, these remarks could signify a desire to counterbalance their geopolitical advances, particularly in the Arctic and Latin America.

Geopolitics of Distraction: A Political Strategy?

Shifting Attention

Sensational statements like these could be designed to distract the public from domestic issues, such as scandals, legal investigations, or economic challenges. They divert media focus to Trump, sidelining other political debates or figures.

Bolstering His Image

By floating bold and controversial ideas, Trump reinforces his persona as an “anti-establishment” and unpredictable leader, capturing public and media attention.

Rallying a Populist Base

Such rhetoric appeals to a voter base seeking simple and spectacular solutions to complex challenges, while fueling their sense of national pride.

Potential Consequences: A Double-Edged Sword

Impact on International Relations

Statements like these may alarm or antagonize allies, weakening international cooperation. They also provide adversaries like China or Russia with ammunition to critique American aggression.

Domestic Polarization

These remarks deepen divisions within the U.S., with some viewing them as visionary and others as reckless.

Loss of Credibility

If these ideas are perceived as unrealistic or purely provocative, they risk tarnishing the U.S.’s reputation as a serious global actor.